|

Frequently Asked Questions
The E-Rate: An Overview
Over the past 20 years, the information revolution has transformed
nearly every aspect of American life. Millions of Americans use
modern technologies to work, gather news and information, access
training and education, conduct business, participate in the civic
life of their communities, and communicate with friends. However,
until Congress enacted the E-Rate as part of the Telecommunications
Act of 1996, few schools and libraries had sufficient resources to
help students and adults keep up with these rapid changes. The
E-Rate is significantly changing this situation. It is helping to
bridge the digital divide by bringing new technologies and the power
of the Internet to urban, rural and low-income schools and
communities nationwide.
What is the E-Rate
What is the E-Rate
designed to do?
What does the E-Rate
provide?
What types of institutions may apply for discounts?
How do schools, libraries, and consortia receive E-Rate discounts?
How large are the discounts?
How are discounts
determined?
Which schools and libraries and what services are being funded by
the E-Rate?
How much money has each state received through the E-Rate program?
Is the E-Rate program
working?
What work remains for
E-Rate?
Are there success stories from states and districts about the
benefits of E-Rate?
What is the E-Rate?
The E-Rate provides $2.25 billion in discounts annually for
advanced, affordable telecommunications services, Internet access
and internal connections to public libraries and public and private
schools. In the first seven years (1998-2004), $14.6 billion in
discounts have brought the Internet and new information technologies
to tens of thousands of public and private schools and libraries,
and to over a million classrooms.
What is the E-Rate
designed to do?
The promise of the E-Rate is straightforward: to assure that all
Americans, regardless of income or geography, can participate in and
benefit from new information technologies, including distance
learning, online assessment, web-based homework, enriched
curriculum, increased communication between parents, students and
their educators, and increased access to government services and
information.
What does the E-Rate provide?
The E-Rate provides discounts to public and private schools, public
libraries and consortia of those entities on telecommunications
services, Internet access and internal networking. E-Rate discounts
are provided through the Federal Communications Commission by
assessing telecommunication carriers for a total of up to $2.25
billion dollars annually. This methodology follows a
long-established Universal Service Fund model, used to ensure
affordable access to telephone services for residents in all areas
of the nation for over 65 years.
What
types of institutions may apply for the discount?
Non-profit elementary and secondary schools (public or private), and
non-profit libraries may apply for E-Rate discounts. Applications
may cover individual schools, entire school districts and consortia.
Schools, libraries, local government agencies and health care
providers may participate in consortia.
Applications are made to the Schools
and Libraries Division, a part of the Universal Service
Administrative Company.
How do schools, libraries and consortia
receive E-Rate discounts?
Applicants do not
receive funds directly. They receive a discounted price. Once an
application is approved, the school, library or consortium accepts a
bid from the telecommunications service provider of its choice. The
provider receives funds from the federal government to make up the
difference between the discounted price and bid price. If no local
telecommunications providers bids on the work, the local telephone
company is required to provide the requested telecommunications
service as the carrier of last resort. For more information about
the E-Rate program, visit the FAQ page at the
Universal Service Administrative
Company (USAC) where general questions about the
Universal Service Fund are posted.
How large are the discounts?
Discounts range from 20 to 90 percent based on local poverty levels.
Schools and libraries must pay the undiscounted portion of their
telecommunications bill themselves.
How are discounts determined?
Discounts are determined by the percentage of students eligible for
the national school lunch program and by the school's (or
consortium's) urban/rural designation.
The matrix chart here outlines the
E-Rate formula.
|
INCOME
Measured by
% of students eligible for the National School Lunch Program
|
URBAN
LOCATION
Discount
|
RURAL
LOCATION
Discount
|
|
If the % of
students in your school that qualify for the National School
Lunch Program is... |
...and you are
in an URBAN area, your discount will be... |
...and
you are in a RURAL area, your discount will be... |
|
Less than 1%
|
20%
|
25%
|
|
1% to 19%
|
40%
|
50%
|
|
20% to 34%
|
50%
|
60%
|
|
35% to 49%
|
60%
|
70%
|
|
50% to 74%
|
80%
|
80%
|
|
75% to 100%
|
90%
|
90%
|
Which schools and libraries and what services are being funded by
the E-rate?
The E-Rate reaches a majority of the nation's schools and libraries.
According to the Universal Service Administrative Company, 82
percent of public schools, 46 percent of private schools, and 61
percent of the nation's libraries received funding in year three of
the program.
The E-Rate
was deliberately structured to ensure that America's neediest
schools and libraries receive priority in E-Rate discounts. The
program's rules require that those entities with the highest
discounts receive limited internal connections funding first.
|
E-Rate first year: |
59 percent of discounts went to the neediest
applicants. |
|
E-Rate second year: |
54 percent of discounts went to the neediest
applicants. |
|
E-Rate third year: |
69 percent of discounts went to the neediest
applicants. |
|
E-Rate fourth year: |
70 percent of discounts went to the neediest
applicants. |
|
E-Rate fifth year |
64 percent of discounts went to the neediest
applicants |
How much money has each state received through the E-Rate program?
(Funding Year data as of
12/31/2008. Funding Year 2008: July 1, 2008-June 30, 2009. Numbers
may not add due to rounding.
Figures are in thousands of dollars.)
|
State |
Calendar Year 2008 Commitments |
Total Program Commitments |
|
Alabama |
45,253 |
346,470 |
|
Alaska |
22,037 |
164,865 |
|
American Samoa |
4,550 |
19,619 |
|
Arizona |
67,177 |
563,123 |
|
Arkansas |
40,461 |
213,796 |
|
California |
291,106 |
3,303,597 |
|
Colorado |
20,124 |
205,001 |
|
Connecticut |
41,913 |
279,309 |
|
Delaware |
876 |
13,796 |
|
District of Columbia |
14,146 |
141,904 |
|
Florida |
100,102 |
777,544 |
|
Georgia |
78,778 |
733,557 |
|
Guam |
37 |
20,932 |
|
Hawaii |
3,502 |
41,321 |
|
Idaho |
5,639 |
48,932 |
|
Illinois |
90,285 |
1,044,456 |
|
Indiana |
32,216 |
270,091 |
|
Iowa |
17,445 |
114,984 |
|
Kansas |
19,470 |
153,743 |
|
Kentucky |
35,629 |
364,127 |
|
Louisiana |
48,699 |
457,050 |
|
Maine |
5,608 |
67,336 |
|
Maryland |
15,436 |
197,143 |
|
Massachusetts |
26,424 |
356,913 |
|
Michigan |
49,087 |
637,386 |
|
Minnesota |
22,123 |
257,855 |
|
Mississippi |
35,074 |
379,195 |
|
Missouri |
31,365 |
415,377 |
|
Montana |
4,160 |
42,490 |
|
Nebraska |
10,224 |
82,161 |
|
Nevada |
11,793 |
55,780 |
|
New Hampshire |
3,245 |
21,457 |
|
New Jersey |
47,359 |
539,366 |
|
New Mexico |
33,134 |
443,267 |
|
New York |
508,701 |
3,321,129 |
|
North Carolina |
61,883 |
494,088 |
|
North Dakota |
4,345 |
38,839 |
|
Northern Mariana Islands |
785 |
11,492 |
|
Ohio |
75,111 |
769,955 |
|
Oklahoma |
45,507 |
446,242 |
|
Oregon |
17,288 |
144,998 |
|
Pennsylvania |
92,579 |
780,532 |
|
Puerto Rico |
16,346 |
275,380 |
|
Rhode Island |
6,523 |
71,244 |
|
South Carolina |
21,303 |
458,803 |
|
South Dakota |
4,622 |
53,914 |
|
Tennessee |
89,934 |
565,146 |
|
Texas |
256,353 |
2,365,440 |
|
Utah |
19,640 |
128,566 |
|
Vermont |
2,045 |
19,712 |
|
Virgin Islands |
5,296 |
38,257 |
|
Virginia |
32,310 |
304,774 |
|
Washington |
24,625 |
252,214 |
|
West Virginia |
15,850 |
105,474 |
|
Wisconsin |
14,994 |
279,797 |
|
Wyoming |
2,136 |
31,535 |
|
TOTALS: |
2,592,653 |
23,731,474 |
|
Is the E-Rate program
working?
The E-Rate has
helped to improve access quickly for libraries and public and
private schools. In
1996, only 28 percent of public library systems offered public
Internet access. Today, thanks to increased resources and the
E-Rate, nearly all library buildings offer public access computing,
and 14 million Americans regularly use these computers at no fee.
Further, only three percent of instructional classrooms were
wired in 1994. As of 2003, 93% of instructional classrooms are
wired. Between 1998 (when the E-Rate launched) and 2003, statistics
show that classroom Internet access disparities between rural,
urban, and suburban schools and high and low-poverty districts have
been dramatically reduced.
Demand for
the E-Rate remains strong. For the 2005 funding year alone, almost
39,000 applications were submitted by schools, libraries, or
consortia for discounts. Discounts requested totaled an estimated
$3.65 billion, far more than available funds. Under the E-Rate
rules, a maximum of $2.25 billion in discounts will be distributed
according to the following priorities: All telecommunications
services and Internet services are discounted first, then internal
connections are covered
starting with the neediest schools until the $2.25 billion cap is
reached.
What work remains for E-Rate?
There are still instructional rooms and libraries that remain
unconnected. And for those that are connected, most rely on E-Rate
discounts to maintain connectivity. Furthermore, much more needs to
be done to determine the quality and speed of connectivity. All
students, educators, and library patrons should have high-speed
Internet connectivity to fully participate and learn in an
information-dominated economy and world.
Are there success stories from states and districts about the
benefits of E-Rate?
Yes. EdLiNC
issued "E-Rate: A Vision of Opportunity and Innovation" in July
2003 (Full
Report) that contains wonderful examples of how the
E-Rate has enriched the lives and learning of students and brought
government resources closer to library patrons who otherwise would
not have access to web-based information and services. Go to
http://www.EdLiNC.org/pdf/ERateReport070803lores.pdf for more.
|
 |